Petit M., Ilbert H. (2016). Geographic indications and rural development: implications for TTIP negotiations. In : Arfini F. (ed.), Mancini M.C. (ed.), Veneziani M. (ed.), Donati M. (ed.). Intellectual property rights for geographical indications: what is at stake in the TTIP?
Newcastle upon Tyne (UK) : Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
p. 211-229.
Titre : | Geographic indications and rural development: implications for TTIP negotiations |
in : | |
Auteurs : | M. Petit ; H. Ilbert |
Type de document : | Chapitre d'ouvrage |
Année de publication : | 2016 |
Format : | p. 211-229 |
Langues : | Anglais |
Langues du résumé : | Anglais |
Catégories : |
Catégories principales 04 - DEVELOPPEMENT LOCAL ET REGIONAL ; 4.3 - Appellations liées au Territoire. Produits du Terroir. QualitéThésaurus IAMM INDICATION GEOGRAPHIQUE PROTEGEE ; DEVELOPPEMENT RURAL ; PRODUIT DU TERROIR ; TTIP ; ACCORD COMMERCIAL ; RELATIONS BILATERALES ; CONFLIT ; MAROC ; UNION EUROPEENNE |
Résumé : | In an earlier paper, we interpreted the resolution of the 2005 WTO dispute on GIs as a stalemate and suggested a shift of the balance of power in favor of the pro-GI coalition. Since then, international negotiations continue to be stalled. The record of GIs as a tool for the promotion of rural development shows that few non-European GIs have been registered. The case of Morocco illustrates the difficulties faced by a government eager to use GIs as a development instrument. International recognition of GIs is difficult. The TTIP might not resolve institutional and doctrinal GI problems. |
Cote : | EUR-M41-ARF-2016 |