Low G., Dalhaus T., Meuwissen M.P.M. (2023). Mixed farming and agroforestry systems: a systematic review on value chain implications. Agricultural systems, 01/03/2023, vol. 206, p. 1-12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103606
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103606
Titre : | Mixed farming and agroforestry systems: a systematic review on value chain implications (2023) |
Auteurs : | G. Low ; T. Dalhaus ; M.P.M. Meuwissen |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Agricultural systems (vol. 206, March 2023) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 1-12 |
Langues : | Anglais |
Langues du résumé : | Anglais |
Catégories : |
Catégories principales 06 - AGRICULTURE. FORÊTS. PÊCHES ; 6.4 - Production Agricole. Système de ProductionThésaurus IAMM SYSTEME DE PRODUCTION ; AGROFORESTERIE ; CHAINE DE VALEUR ; CULTURE EN MELANGE ; AGROECOLOGIE |
Résumé : | CONTEXT Mixed farming and agroforestry systems (MiFAS) are widely proposed to deal with ecological, economic, and social challenges that are associated with specialised farming systems. However, little is known about how MiFAS are integrated in food value chains and how value creation in MiFAS is rewarded by value chain actors. OBJECTIVE We review the broad literature on MiFAS (80 papers) with a particular focus on implications for food value chains. METHODS We use thematic analysis to code existing evidence and categorise these codes into four major themes: MiFAS value creation, Impacts of the farming environment on value creation, Ecosystem service valuation, and Supply & value chain integration. From here, we produce meta-narratives to summarise the literature within each theme. In a second step, we use these literature insights to develop possible value chain configurations that operationalise MiFAS in food value chains. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS We find that: a) integrating farming enterprises tends to improve yields and land-use efficiency and can reduce variable costs; b) MiFAS seem to face significant challenges with respect to fixed costs, such as of capital investments, and of labour; c) high opportunity costs associated with MiFAS can be a drawback for farms seeking to become more integrated as limited knowledge and the time to establish profitable MiFAS can deter adoption; d) sources of value creation within MiFAS stem from its ability to reduce variable costs as well as maintain or raise inputs, primarily by improving the efficiency of resources such as nutrients and land; and e) inter-farmer partnerships and collaboration have the potential to shorten MiFAS supply chains and extend value capture for farmers by allowing them greater ownership of value created. SIGNIFICANCE In total, insights into value chain implications of MiFAS are scarce. Therefore, our research delivers important implications for future research on MiFAS that should focus more on value chain implications of this emerging food production system. |
Cote : | En ligne |
URL / DOI : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103606 |