| Titre : | Hovering between the need to assess and the willing to comprehend. Potentials and limitations of the ecosystem services analytical framework |
| in : | |
| Auteurs : | V. Capocefalo ; M. Requier-Desjardins ; A. Dal Borgo |
| Type de document : | Communication à un Congrès (avec Actes) |
| Editeur : | Italy [Firenze] : Societa di studi Geografici, 2025 |
| Collection : | Memorie Geografiche, num. 28 |
| ISBN/ISSN/EAN : | 978-88-946901-8-7 |
| Format : | p. 136-143 |
| Note générale : | Sessione 4 |
| Langues : | Anglais |
| Langues du résumé : | Anglais |
| Catégories : |
Catégories principales 07 - ENVIRONNEMENT ; 7.4 - Ressources Naturelles : Paysage, Biodiversité, Patrimoine naturelThésaurus IAMM SERVICE ECOSYSTEMIQUE ; CAPITAL ENVIRONNEMENTAL ; CAPITAL TERRITORIAL ; AGRICULTURE URBAINE ; AGRICULTURE PERIURBAINE ; ITALIE ; TURQUIE |
| Résumé : |
Nowadays ecosystem services (ES) represent a paradigm often adopted by national biodiversity and ecosystems conservation and restoration strategies especially within the European context. For several scholars ES constitute a clear and coherent framework, enabling dialogues among different scientific disciplines and with policy-makers. However, other critical studies have identified ES as controversial and ethically problematic. The elements highlighted relate in particular with the underestimation of power relations, carbon credits markets and Payments for Ecosystem Services schemes, which can generate strong territorial inequalities. Sometimes, critical elements also emerge on the technical-scientific side. For example, boundaries between different categories of ES are not evident to the members of the local communities engaged since in real life they are experienced in an unitarian way. Indeed, local socio-cultural systems can differ greatly from the one within which the same ES analytical framework has evolved and the ones within which
researchers engaged in the analysis have been trained. Given these premises, the contribution aims to highlight how these limitations can be overcome and how it is possible to assess ES keeping social justice and environmental sustainability as goals. The reflection proposed is based on studies conducted over the years by the authors in Italy and Turkey. The final objective pursued is to understand how the paradigm can be applied in a reflexive manner, taking into account its notoriety and recognition by the scientific community both in the respective national contexts and in the international debate. |
| Congrès : | 14. Oltre l Globalizzazione: Transizioni/Transitions, 2024/12/06, Florence (Italie) |
| Cote : | Online |
| URL / DOI : | https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SmhWXZY3fyo5nJRY0v97eje2L1ZUJYxQ/view |
Documents numériques (2)
 PRO52839.pdf Adobe Acrobat PDF | PRO52839_slides.pdf Adobe Acrobat PDF |
