| Titre : | Research frameworks in agricultural living labs: a systematic review and comparative analysis (2026) |
| Auteurs : | M. Yousefi ; B. Matzdorf ; F. Ewert |
| Type de document : | Article |
| Dans : | Agricultural systems (vol. 233, March 2026) |
| Article en page(s) : | p. 104629 |
| Langues : | Anglais |
| Langues du résumé : | Anglais |
| Catégories : |
Catégories principales 12 - EDUCATION. FORMATION. INFORMATION. GESTION DES SAVOIRS ; 12.6 - Politique Scientifique. RechercheThésaurus IAMM RECHERCHE AGRICOLE ; AGROECOSYSTEME ; INNOVATION ; DURABILITE |
| Mots-clés: | LIVING LAB ; LABORATOIRE VIVANT |
| Résumé : | Context Agricultural Living Labs (LLs) have emerged as a promising approach to foster innovation and sustainability in agroecosystems, addressing complex food system challenges. Despite the growing number of LL initiatives, little is known about the research frameworks that guide their design, implementation, and evaluation. Objective This study systematically reviews peer-reviewed literature to identify and synthesize the conceptual, methodological, and theoretical frameworks applied in agricultural LLs. Methods We developed an analytical framework derived from core LL characteristics to assess how these research frameworks address agricultural context integration, stakeholder involvement, innovation processes, and sustainability outcomes. Results and conclusions The results revealed six research frameworks, each characterized by a distinct analytical focus, including Coupled-Systems Perspective (enabling policy integration), Nexus Approach (cross-sectoral resource management), Participatory Action Research (PAR) (stakeholder empowerment), the Systems Innovation Approach (SIA) (supporting systemic innovation), Design-Oriented Case Study (digital solution design), and Boundary Objects Framework (cross-actor collaboration). These research frameworks play an essential role in structuring LL processes, particularly in defining system boundaries, actor involvement, and pathways for knowledge co-creation. However, our review highlights that in the agricultural LLs, most frameworks lack explicit consideration of economic sustainability or business model development, and few offer structured tools for long-term impact assessment, which can be a key factor for the long-term success of LLs. Significance This study contributes to reinforcing the foundations of agricultural LLs and guides researchers and practitioners to select or adapt suitable approaches for future LL initiatives in agriculture. |
| Cote : | En ligne |
| URL / DOI : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2025.104629 |
Accueil
Sélection de la langue
Adresse
ÉQUIPE
Nous contacter
Informations pratiques
contact
