Jones N., Graziano M., Dimitrakopoulos P.G. (2020). Social impacts of European protected areas and policy recommendations. Environmental Science & Policy, 01/10/2020, vol. 112, p. 134-140.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.004
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.004
Titre : | Social impacts of European protected areas and policy recommendations (2020) |
Auteurs : | N. Jones ; M. Graziano ; P.G. Dimitrakopoulos |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Environmental Science & Policy (vol. 112, October 2020) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 134-140 |
Langues : | Anglais |
Langues du résumé : | Anglais |
Catégories : |
Catégories principales 07 - ENVIRONNEMENT ; 7.4 - Ressources Naturelles : Paysage, Biodiversité, Patrimoine naturelThésaurus IAMM ZONE PROTEGEE ; BIEN ETRE SOCIAL ; IMPACT SOCIAL ; PHYSIOLOGIE SENSORIELLE ; EVALUATION ; BIODIVERSITE ; EUROPE |
Mots-clés: | EVALUATION NON MONETAIRE |
Résumé : | Effective designation of Protected Areas (PAs) requires the careful consideration of their social impacts as these are perceived by people. These refer to a variety of issues such as the distribution of power, social equity, social relations and more importantly the impact of PAs on human wellbeing. A number of studies have emerged in the past decade aiming to capture social impacts of PAs across the world through non-monetary assessments taking into consideration people's perceptions. Although Europe is the region with the largest in proportion number of Protected Areas across the world it is also a region with very limited scientific evidence on this topic. As the European Union is preparing to implement its new Biodiversity Strategyto ipkmplement this paper aims to provide the first comprehensive review of the literature regarding social impacts of European PAs and highlight new directions for current policy frameworks in the region. The paper focuses on the perceived non-economic social costs and benefits of PAs and identifies 7 key categories of social impacts. We propose that policy planning for biodiversity conservation in Europe should incorporate subjective assessments of social costs and benefits with the aim to achieve an increase of benefits for people and their equal distribution across social groups. |
Cote : | Réservé lecteur CIHEAM |
URL / DOI : | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.004 |