Pachoud C. (2021). Territorialization of public action and mountain pastoral areas Case study of the territorial pastoral plans of the Rhône-Alpes region, France. Sustainability, 15/07/2021, vol. 13, n. 14, p. 1-14.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13148014
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13148014
Titre : | Territorialization of public action and mountain pastoral areas Case study of the territorial pastoral plans of the Rhône-Alpes region, France (2021) |
Auteurs : | C. Pachoud |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Sustainability (vol. 13, n. 14, July 2021) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 1-14 |
Langues : | Anglais |
Langues du résumé : | Anglais |
Catégories : |
Catégories principales 06 - AGRICULTURE. FORÊTS. PÊCHES ; 6.4 - Production Agricole. Système de ProductionThésaurus IAMM PASTORALISME ; TERRITOIRE ; DEVELOPPEMENT TERRITORIAL ; GOUVERNANCE TERRITORIALE ; POLITIQUE AGRICOLE ; REGION D'ALTITUDE ; FRANCE ; RHONE ALPES |
Résumé : | Territorialization aims at improving the effectiveness of public action by adapting to local contexts and including a wide diversity of actors. In the 2000s, the French local authorities, with the support of the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), launched more transversal and bottom-up policies on the development of mountain pastoral territories in order to counter national and European sectoral and top-down policies. This article focuses on the Territorial Pastoral Plans (TPPs), a policy of the Rhône-Alpes region, which funds projects defined collaboratively between multiple actors in pastoral territories. The objective is to shed the light on the implementation modalities of the TPPs, and to understand the strengths and weaknesses of this policy in terms of governance to respond to the sustainability challenges of the Rhône-Alpine pastoral territories. A document analysis was achieved and interviews were conducted with nine key actors from four pastoral territories. Results showed that awareness-raising and mediation projects are becoming increasingly important because of the growing conflicts linked to the multi-purpose use of these lands and to wolf predation. Moreover, the integration of environmental actors allows better consideration of ecology in projects. However, the current budgetary restrictions limit their capacity of action within the policy. |
Cote : | En ligne |
URL / DOI : | https://doi.org/10.3390/su13148014 |