Kraak V.I., Niewolny K.L. (2024). A scoping review of food systems governance frameworks and models to develop a typology for social change movements to transform food systems for people and planetary health. Sustainability, 02/02/2024, vol. 16, n. 4, p. 1469.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041469
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041469
Titre : | A scoping review of food systems governance frameworks and models to develop a typology for social change movements to transform food systems for people and planetary health (2024) |
Auteurs : | V.I. Kraak ; K.L. Niewolny |
Type de document : | Article |
Dans : | Sustainability (vol. 16, n. 4, February 2024) |
Article en page(s) : | p. 1469 |
Langues : | Anglais |
Langues du résumé : | Anglais |
Catégories : |
Catégories principales 06 - AGRICULTURE. FORÊTS. PÊCHES ; 6.4 - Production Agricole. Système de ProductionThésaurus IAMM SYSTEME AGROALIMENTAIRE ; SYSTEME ALIMENTAIRE ALTERNATIF ; PROTECTION DE L'ENVIRONNEMENT ; SANTE ; GOUVERNANCE ; SOCIETE CIVILE |
Résumé : | Effective governance is essential to transform food systems and achieve the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals 2030. Different political ideologies and paradigms inhibit or drive social change movements. This study examined how food systems governance has been described. Thereafter, we reviewed graphic frameworks and models to develop a typology for civil society actors to catalyze social change movements to transform food systems for people and the planet. The scoping review involved (1) formulating research questions; (2) developing a search strategy to identify evidence from four English-language electronic databases and reports, 2010?2023; and (3?4) selecting, analyzing, and synthesizing evidence into a narrative review. Results yielded 5715 records, and 36 sources were selected that described and depicted graphic frameworks and models examined for purpose, scale, political ideology, paradigm, discourse, principles, governance, and democracy. Evidence was used to develop a graphic food systems governance typology with distinct political ideologies (i.e., neoliberal, reformist, progressive, radical); paradigms (i.e., maintain, reform, transition, transform); discourses (i.e., food enterprise, food security, food justice, food sovereignty); types of governance (i.e., multistakeholder, shared, self); and democracy (i.e., representative, participatory, deliberative). This proof-of-concept typology could be applied to examine how change agents use advocacy and activism to strengthen governance for sustainable diets, regenerative food systems, and planetary health. |
Cote : | En ligne |
URL / DOI : | https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041469 |